Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by timpera 1 day ago
Anthropic has been surprisingly bad at comms for the last few months, which I find crazy in such a competitive market.
7 comments

I feel everyone running these companies has stopped caring what the public think. It's all about selling their vision to politicians now. Which is also why they try to tie everything with "national security" — the average joe hears it and thinks about forever wars in the Middle East, the average congressman hears it and approves whatever solution is suggested.
Yes, but the strategy is a lost cause as we're seeing.

In virtually any other situation, companies would be able to successfully grease politicians. The problem for AI companies is they spent the last several years broadcasting that their tech is going to take everyone job, and consequently their livelihood.

No matter how much you bribe a politician, you can't hold and maintain elected office when the voters overwhelmingly do not want something.

People think ‘good at comms’ is to present stuff the public thinks is right. In reality, ‘good at comms’ to the comms team is to do whatever the CEO wants to talk about.

Not that I support this, but I believe this is how comms team sees it.

I often wonder why that is. I think the old playbook for companies is just too slow and the consequences of the "new mask off" are not present in the current climate in the US. Everytime these CEOs make these announcements I always feel like they aren't talking to me, their costumers or the people but to the investors and their government. Something they have always said and done, just those conversions were behind closed doors and would be scandalous if heard. Now the playbook is to blog/tweet those fucked up views for more effect and faster reaction to get what you want.
Amodei is crawling back into Trump's ass.
It would've been surprising before LLMs. Now that you could run all of your communication through AI, or at least have it check it, it's outright negligent.
I find “bad at comms” to be such a cop out. As if it’s saying that the company is so troubled and misunderstood, but really, you would see, is good if only they could figure out how to _communicate_ all their complex thoughts
I think it's a useful distinction, there are lots of companies doing bad things that also happen to have "better comms".
Compared to what?
Current big picture reality is bad for comms unfortunately. As another commenter quoted, "You can put lipstick on a pig, it'll still be a pig". Cuban Missile Crisis wasn't very calm. Do you think a company this well-capitalized and smart is just bumbling around like idiots? Everything makes sense if one just actually entertains the idea that they are earnest and we are in a dangerous arms race
> Everything makes sense if one just actually entertains the idea that they are earnest and we are in a dangerous arms race

That would require me to ignore the benign reality of open LLM proliferation, so naturally most people will see this as a manipulative lie.