[throw0101d]

> And you think the peatlands were natural? In France, in 1857, a stone's throw from Bordeaux?

If it is indeed a question between "artificially forest" or "artificially peat", then pick what's most useful to humans at the moment: how much lumber is needed? Is resin tapping still important? How much more utility is that compared to having to deal with wildfires that seem to regularly rip through the area over the decades:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1949_Landes_forest_fire

Does 100% of what is now forest 'have' to stay that way? Or 80%? 50?

> You have to love all the people on this website giving advice on Europeans and Canadians on forest management

1. I am Canadian.

2. The French themselves have considered doing something else besides the forest that is currently there:

* https://www.lemonde.fr/en/opinion/article/2022/08/16/mps-sho...

* https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S02648...