'Ruliology' is an ignorant neologism, and whoever thought it up should be dropped down a well. Canonology is linguistically consistent without being obscure.
I didn't realize he'd coined it, but this is consistent. I don't want to drop him down a well because I think his ideas are very interesting, even if they're wrong. Nevertheless, [827 words deleted]!
I went through a process of “what the fuck is this bullshit” to “ok, yes, that makes sense and can suffice for my multiverse worldview until someone writes a better one” when I read all his foundational essays on the topic.
It's part of his GUT. You will likely become committed to the well when you encounter ruliad: https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2021/11/the-concept-of-t...