|
|
|
|
|
by swiftcoder
1 day ago
|
|
> It was purely about maxing your compensation because changing jobs nets you more than promotions & raises. You don't view it as a problem that companies consistently compensate new hires higher than they are their experienced employees? Hell, I would have been perfectly happy to never change employers in my entire career to date, if my salary had anywhere near kept pace with my peers who were job-hopping. |
|
It depends on the current employee and the incoming employee. They are not interchangeable cogs. Also not everyone consistently provides good value over their tenure -- a lot tend to work hard early and then for various reasons taper off. It's not necessarily their fault, but companies definitely are aware of this.
Personally I tend to value growth of my skillset over growth of income and that has largely informed my movement. I move when there's no longer interesting work if the compensation is at least fair. I've never been about comparing myself to others -- especially when most of my peers' left the industry after 5-10 years.