|
|
|
|
|
by otherme123
1 day ago
|
|
> I am not sure what author is trying to hint. But solar does not need artificial subsidies, and can pay for itself! I think he is describing a subside that some governments gave years ago: you installed for example 5K, and get paid for whatever they generate at 300% market price, for a long time (25 years?). Today you find out that upgrading panels would made perfect financial sense, if you were selling at 100% and are going to sell electricity at 100% (you will be doubling the output for a tenth of the inversion 15 years ago), but as the subsides of 300% no longer exist, you will be actually losing money by upgrading. |
|