[thatjoeoverthr]

It doesn’t matter which model it was sampled from. In any case, time isn’t fungible. I consider censuring it substantially more valuable use of time than reading it. And it’s definitely more pleasurable than reading the same verbal tics over and over again because some hustler can’t be bothered to edit their story before sending it out. If you expect to dump an unedited draft from a text sampler, you’re delusional. (Calling you delusional is also more pleasurable, and a more valuable use of time, than reading verbal tics.)

[chungusamongus]

But You've spent so much more time complaining and rationalizing your biases than it would take to simply read the story.

[thatjoeoverthr]

Correct. Ideal. The story deserves zero time. In this way, I am in agreement with its publisher.