|
|
|
|
|
by sheept
2 days ago
|
|
One of the strengths of TypeScript besides its expressiveness is that it's compatible with the massive npm ecosystem. Most packages only ship untyped JavaScript with type declarations defining the interface,[0] so realistically you'd still need a JavaScript engine if you use any packages. But if you're starting from scratch and know you won't be using any npm packages, you might as well use AssemblyScript.[2] [0]: Publishing packages in TypeScript is explicitly discouraged by Node[1]. TypeScript isn't backwards compatible even in minor releases, and its compiler settings aren't portable for packages. [1]: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/doc/api/typescript.... [2]: https://www.assemblyscript.org/ |
|
Looks like Scriptc's solution to that problem is that it can optionally bundle a 620KB quickjs-ng JavaScript engine if you have dependencies that need to be executed that way.