Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by coldbrewed 5 days ago
The water was likely redirected for agricultural purposes and the farmers won't/can't surrender it on top of drought, if it's anything like the US. Would be real cool if we could make investments like this though.
2 comments

This is another point that is overlooked. If you transform a landscape, moving the water through quickly or whatever, preventing the natural action (eg deeply drenching the ground) perhaps you create a high risk of a fire where the ground gets very hot, where that wasn't a possibility before.
In this case no, all the water is drained. I don't think meaningful amounts are retained for agriculture.
The pine forest is the agriculture.
Well... Turns out that it went up in flames...