|
|
|
|
|
by nilkn
6 days ago
|
|
You gave an example of Linux having value, which is not contested and not relevant. You did not give any examples showing the existence of an exponential here. Moreover, the value being discussed is long-term geopolitical leverage resulting from a country's sovereign technology capability that remains unperturbed under heavily adversarial conditions, not shareholder value. In fact, it is a direct corollary of my claims that the two concepts of value are not equivalent, and that is precisely the trap being set and the gap being exploited. |
|
Do I really need to explain in this community how Linux went from some underground freeware to the most used OS in the world? How is that not "sovereign technology capability".
If a machine uses software in any way shape or form, it's about 70% likely Linux powers it. Doesn't matter what industry or topic it is. America only remained a superpower this long because it was an early adopter of modern compute and shaped much of its GDP around software powering every industry.
The only thing not sovereign about it is that many technologies are technically holed up in private companies, that the US government contracts. But I don't know how you can say the growth hasn't been exponential.
I feel we're nitpicking over minutae at this point so I'll cut it off here.