[RealityVoid]

Tools? Yes. Reliable foundations? Eh, mostly not. Maybe I'm holding it wrong, but I'm not impressed. Not in the least because in order to get a good system you must have a good image of the system in your head. And if AI builds the system, how will you ever get that system in your head?

[bonoboTP]

How would you do it if you hired an employee in your company to do it? You'd talk to the employee and read the docs they write. Same here.

[RealityVoid]

When an employee writes a system, the employee owns the system. When an AI writes a system for you, YOU own the system.

[bonoboTP]

Owns? What a strange word to use. I doubt they own it in the sense that the profits of it go to their bank account. Use a better word and things will be clearer.

[RealityVoid]

Yes, owns. Ownership as in accountability, stewardship and care. But I think you already got this from my post and if we're fighting about semantics, there's no constructive discussion to be had.

[bonoboTP]

Accountability - yes, you can fire a human. But you can also fire the AI, by switching to a different model or switching back to manual coding. The rest just depends on having a strong enough model.