|
|
|
|
|
by lanstin
2 days ago
|
|
The (or a) current neuroscience models of the brain are that its main job is to predict how the body should be responding in the near future. Obviously a lot more complex network nodes than an LLM, but prediction is clearly tied up with thought in some way. I don’t find LLMs to be very good independent thinkers, but I wouldn’t over sell our own mentation either - it clearly arises from a large number of simpler entities. The more significant difference is that the LLM is stuck with language which is clearly an emergent and secondary capability of our own thinking. We can formulate words to explain things, but we also can look at two volumes and feel what it means that one is larger than the other. Raise a toddler and you can see the progression from not understanding, repeated experiments, muscle memory and finally to conscious point for reasoning. |
|
That's why I think it's remarkable that we've managed to (choosing my words very, very carefully here) create a statistical model that does a remarkably decent job at emulating the behavior of a fragment of that process.