[johnnyanmac]

>People really need to stop providing this knee jerk outlawing reaction to things they don't like.

No, we need way more regulation on jobs in the US. This country is sacking millions in real time but reporting record profits. That isn't right nor healthy.

>I assume you'd also make it illegal for a person to turn down a company without a reason, right?

Who holds the cards in the relationship, again? It's illegal to distriminate against hirees, but a person can choose any reason to take an offer over another.

[matchbok3]

The EU has tons of regulations on this stuff and we see what "innovation" they have. No thanks.

Relationship? There is no relationship. It is a business transaction. Both parties are free to leave at any point.

[johnnyanmac]

>we see what "innovation" they have.

Yes, a much more stable job market, the ability for its leaders to pass bills, and actual resistance against the so called immigration people are all up in arms about.Turns out you can manage that without creates a domestic scare campaign.

And what have they done with it practically? Breakthroughs in sustainability and environmental technology, materials engineering, neuroscienc, and yes: even semiconductors. You can do great things for the world without sucking up to shareholders and abusing your labor.

>Both parties are free to leave at any point.

Spoken like someone who's never had to live paycheck to paycheck.

There are employed people who still need to rely on food stamps to live. No, it is not a balanced relationship, and one party keeps lobbying to make it worse.