[simonw]

Kernel development is excluded from this, because it's covered by "Upstream projects using LLMs for development".

On security, I worry that proposal A's "forbid any contributions to Debian written with the use or assistance of large language models", as written, excludes contributions where the LLM assisted in discovering the vulnerability. That's clearly a bad policy, and they should update their wording to clarify that.

[yjftsjthsd-h]

I read the question more as, if AI is working out for the kernel, why not a distro? (This is a question with valid answers, like the kernel having more devs paid to handle things while maintaining quality, but it's a fair question)

[aspensmonster]

Isn't basically every package in Debian an upstream project?

[simonw]

They're talking about the software that is unique to Debian, like their lintian tool. https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian