Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by seanhunter 7 days ago
I have no idea why you have this weird axe to grind. Yes she has done research

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep01303

https://www.thelancet.com/article/S1473-3099(20)30457-6/full...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03164-7

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.16.20023754v...

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-journal-of-...

Etc etc. That’s papers in Nature, The Lancet, The European Journal of Applied Mathematics etc. If you actually searched you would have found tons and tons of papers and citations. She clearly does “hardcore” research by any reasonable definition as you would expect given she has been for some time a professor at UCL which is a top-tier university.

1 comments

Between 2017 and 2021 she also had two children, cervical cancer, a radical hysterectomy, lymphoedema and reconstructive surgery for that.

She is a properly impressive person who warrants no shade, but it never surprises me to see it.

I guess she's no Richard Feynman, just like literally everyone else on the planet...
There are examples like Stephen Hawking, and he did truly impressive work in hardcore science as far as I know, despite the challenges and obstacles that he had in life. Hannah Fry has done a lot of soft work, lots of books and other media, lots of activity, a very hardworking person, and very skilled at popularity work. But that does not change my impression that her focus is not really on hardcore science.