Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dredmorbius 3 days ago
Multiple chains of evidence may be used to support a conclusion. One conclusive chain is sufficient, even if others are equivocal.

You're focusing on the weakest part of the argument, which HN guidelines explicitly request you not do: <https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html>.

(Less so if others are exculpatory. Which is not the case here. A known false positive is not conclusive proof, but neither does it explicitly clear a source.)

See for more explanation: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49044401>.