[m132]

> This attack vector requires both that the user enabled developer settings and that they have remote adb enabled.

Not just that. A non-development Android build will also prompt the user when a connection is made to authorize the client's key.

This once again isn't about security of users, this is about security of the company's interests.

[sigmoid10]

Google just got hit by yet another record antitrust fine by the EU [1]. But as long as they see these fines as cost of doing business, nothing will change. Especially if it always takes almost a decade to push this through the judicial system. Their net income last year alone was $130 Billion.

[1] https://www.reuters.com/world/eu-top-court-dismisses-google-...

[ciefa]

Eh, that is if they pay. Trump already made threats for tariffs in regards to those fines.

[Danox]

Which is a federal sales tax against the citizens of the United States countries abroad do not pay no matter how many times taco lies.

[ffsm8]

You're splitting hairs in this case, while that's unquestionably true, it's irrelevant if there tariffs are only set on one party.

That's why Trump's tariffs on everything was so ... Uh ... "Interesting". If only one party gets the tariffs, you end up with other parties selling the goods instead, which does cause meaningful damage to the tariffed party

[Grombobulous]

Or the tariffing party just continues buying very nearly the same amount of things at higher prices in many categories because those items don’t have perfectly elastic supply and demand.

[ffsm8]

Technically true but highly misleading. The amount of good like that are few, less then 30% of the EU -> US trade.

[oblio]

The EU shouldn't be regulating Google like this.

The US should.

[trollbridge]

The DOJ brought an antitrust case against Google… and won.

Then the judge pretty much decided “no consequences”.

[echelon]

It was the lamest excuse ever.

Something like, "I'm worried about impairing Google's ability to compete in AI" or some nonsense. (Paraphrasing here.)

Looks like all it takes to compete in AI is to issue stock or get a bunch of investors. I don't see how Google would struggle with that. It's completely orthogonal to antitrust enforcement.

[sigmoid10]

Actually, the EU should very much crack down on any foreign company that abuses its market position to stifle local business competition. There's no good reason to allow them to break local laws and diminish the local economy just because they keep their headquarters outside the EU.

[3form]

Why not both? Countries should be able to signal which business practices are undesirable.

[oblio]

The EU can't realistically bring Google to its knees. The US could.

I say that as a European that's very much in favor of government intervention to fix market distortions.

[_blk]

Yes, laws are laws but one affects a branch, the other a root.

[froggit]

Cut off enough branches and the roots die.

[dotancohen]

The EU absolutely should be regulating companies that operate in her jurisdiction. Google is free to pursue other markets.

[lofaszvanitt]

Hopeless. US already lost against corps. And that will be their downfall.