|
|
|
|
|
by pfdietz
4 days ago
|
|
Yes, that was your response. It was a terrible and obviously invalid response, as I explained. You never explained why the GPU temperature had to increase. Could you explain that now? The GPU would be on the cold side of the heat pump, not the hot side. > Also, how do you deal with the added cost and complexity for the solar tracking mechanisms for the "edge-on-to-the-Sun" radiator? We ignore that issue, because we were debunking a bad argument about "the laws of physics". The laws of physics say nothing about budgets or complexity. |
|