|
|
|
|
|
by brookst
4 days ago
|
|
Many apologies for giving the impression you got. I should have said: after reading the screed, a quick scan of its assertions and rhetorical techinques made it clear that it’s it serious thinking. I am sure a rigorous analysis would turn up even more hand waving and lack of nuance. But who has the time to read zealots deeply? |
|