[AussieWog93]

> many ‘vibe coders’ are annoying, negative net value assholes

Where on Earth does this sentiment come from? I've had people make AI contributions to my open-source projects and while they may be perhaps less technical on average they're every bit as well intentioned - possibly moreso since they're interested in improving the project rather than establishing a little fiefdom.

[raffael_de]

> AI contributions

using AI is not vibe coding. the difference is whether a developer takes responsibility and the according measures before releasing/contributing or not.

[HelloNurse]

I agree with the distinction between using a LLM as a tool to make personal contributions to healthy projects and expecting Codeberg to host arbitrary slop, but I'm afraid you are assuming good faith.

The "developer" could be a bot, or a tool-assisted criminal or activist, and they might be using LLMs to enhance their ability to add stealthy malware, plant patent or copyright violations, impose not quite shared technical choices, and so on.

Many open source projects ban AI contributions just because they are an efficiently low effort way to waste the time of the actual maintainers.

[IshKebab]

Well I think they are probably well intentioned and annoying... and possibly net negative but I'll reserve judgement on that.

E.g. I've had people find genuine bugs and then basically paste their entire Claude conversation into the issue. Very annoying.