|
|
|
|
|
by akimbostrawman
5 days ago
|
|
>but is irrelevant in practical terms It very much is not. If I use cash to commit a crime but then deposit it into a KYC bank account which is then used as a side channel to get me caught does not mean its the cashes fault. XMR privacy and anonymity can not protect you from going out of your way to convert it into inferior surveillance currency which then gets you busted. That's basic logic and should be a obvious technical limitation. |
|
By "practical terms" I mean that a criminal sitting in prison isn't going to care whether the vulnerability that got them there was layer 7 or not. It doesn't fucking matter to them at that point.
Everything on the internet is vulnerable to netflow traffic deanonymization; it is a fundamental limitation with the design of the internet. The only thing that stops these attacks from being more common is the relative difficulty of obtaining the required data.