[animesh]

Just noticed that there is a filter on repositories "Collaborative". Is this indication that we will not be allowed (immediately or eventually) to store either public or private repositories if we are not collaborating with others?

[selfhoster1312]

Not really. See https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/faq/#how-about-pri...

[animesh]

Sorry, but I do not understand. Can I host a repo publicly at least while it is still in initial development stages? For example, I have two repos that have been in development for more than 2 years. I intend to show case them and continue them as open source, but I will probably be the only user for a while. These two predate AI/LLM advancements, and I am pretty anti-AI for non-professional use cases. As someone put it, it is single-user open source repo with low or zero users, and have low commits, and are well below any storage limits.

[inigyou]

Yes, unless it's obviously something that is only ever usable by you. If they did remove it for some reason anyway, they would contact you first because it isn't spam.

[selfhoster1312]

Sure, i linked the docs about private repos specifically. Public repositories of FLOSS are the mission of codeberg, minus slopware and shitcoins (the subject of this thread). I thought the FAQ was pretty clear about that, but if that's not the case, i guess PRs are welcome to improve it.