[caraffle]

This is fear mongering at best and unbelievable. Why would a surgeon know anything about anesthesia risk? Anesthesia regurarly cancels cases due to safety concerns - there's no "protocol" or "getting in trouble" (what does that even mean), that's standard of care. "Anesthesia" is a doctor too and ultimately holds the call on if they will put a patient under or not.

[Supermancho]

This is matches my experience, having been under at least 30 times.

The phrase:

"Why would a surgeon know anything about anesthesia risk?"

could be misleading to someone who has never undergone (or just didn't understand) what a pre-surgery anesthesiologist consult is for.

Surgeries are performed by teams. Anesthesia is one aspect of the procedure and most of the doctors know some, while surgeons know a great deal. The anesthesiologist's job, as a physician, is to monitor, adjust, and assess risk during the procedure. This disclosure, if it happened, was during the consultation.

[amatecha]

> Why would a surgeon know anything about anesthesia risk?

Idunno, maybe because their entire career is performing surgeries which include anaesthesia and they have worked for potentially decades alongside anaesthesiologists? For instance, I've worked in the same type of role (programmer) for my entire career and I somehow know a ton about the disciplines adjacent or closely related to mine, especially because I work with them every day.

[Supermancho]

Graciously, I think this was the point they were trying to make, with an inappropriately sarcastic intro.

[solenoid0937]

Medicine is not programming.

[Georgelemental]

"Anesthesia" could also be a nurse anesthesist, nurses generally aren't supposed to contradict doctors in front of patients