[GuB-42]

Besides the usual jargon, what I find interesting is that the tradition of always naming things after their discoverers: Fourier, Falconer, Furstenberg, Kakeya. 4 names in one sentence.

Other fields do it, but it is almost systematic in math, and arguably, it makes things even harder to understand as people names are not descriptive.

[nine_k]

There are no way to name most problems both compactly and descriptively. The inability to attach an acceptably descriptive moniker to a problem leads to calling the problems (and solutions, theorems, etc) after the author.

[CogDisco]

But then there's the opposite in maths where there's an overload on "plain" terminology. "Normal" means a billion different things. Same as "regular" or "simple".

Omitting the human history of a field does not automatically make it easier.