Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by behnamoh 9 days ago
It's a matter of philosophy; would you rather have multiple small apps that do only one job or one "super app" that does it all?

Ironically, starting from the former, I've now turned my tmux into the latter with so many utility apps integrated into it. But now I can see the benefits of each approach. Maintaining "super apps" is more challenging due to the coupling of so many pieces to each other.
2 comments
kleiba2 9 days ago
If the "super app" is modular - like Emacs is - you basically get the best of both worlds.
link
dietr1ch 9 days ago
And building a consistent good experience from isolated tools is even harder. The problem is just hard and I think good criteria with the super app approach is the way to go.

I really like Spacemacs. It's discoverable, extendable, quite consistent.

link
behnamoh 9 days ago
> And building a consistent good experience from isolated tools is even harder.

Yes, I agree, which is why my tmux slowly devours my numerous small utility apps into itself! I haven't tried Spacemacs yet, too Vim-pilled at the moment..

link
BeetleB 9 days ago
> I haven't tried Spacemacs yet, too Vim-pilled at the moment..

You do know that Spacemacs defaults to Vim bindings, right?

link