|
|
|
|
|
by hombre_fatal
5 days ago
|
|
Yeah, they are setting up a capricious environment which is hard to avoid with rules like this. In the blog post they complain about AI-assisted projects being too polished, using CI resources even though it's a one-man project with zero users. (Reasons they don't give for banning it in the TOS) So, what's the rule exactly? Can I set up release builds on my one-man project or not? What about when the clearly vibe-coded project does it, do I report them? Does everyone just remember to not check in their AGENTS.md when pushing to codeberg? I think things should just cost money. Far better than a nonsensical honor system around LLMs which has the obvious outcome of hiding LLM use. That said, they can foster what ever environment they want. I think it's just a regressive self-limiting view that tries to pretend like the world isn't changing with rules that have bad downstream outcomes, as opposed to a platform that accepts reality and figures out what to do from there. And I find that disappointing. |
|