[artisinal]

If this CPU is not socketable by design, why not pick a CPU that is? There are plenty of options. Repairability is more important than raw speed. That is why people pick Framework. It’s not the best machine at everything but it’s easy to repair.

[tristor]

You fundamentally cannot do things on the system you are envisioning that you can do on a Framework Desktop, or DGX Spark, or MBP M5 Max. Simple as that. Repairable modular laptops were a fairly rare thing when Framework came out. A repairable modular desktop is just a normal desktop computer. A desktop computer in a compact form factor that can run AI workloads though is a much rarer thing.

[artisinal]

My computer with socketed CPU had no issues being a computer. It’s so strange for Framework to make a machine you can’t repair. It’s the Framework Desktop. Why not create the best possible repairable Desktop instead of using some niche CPU soldered to the board? Not everyone has AI workloads. Some people just browse the web a little.

[tristor]

Can it run a local LLM with 35B+ parameters using GPU acceleration for reasonable token performance? If not, then you're being obtuse.

[artisinal]

How many people use a desktop for a local LLM with 35B+ parameters? Maybe 0.0001% of computer users?

[tristor]

The people who buy a Framework Desktop with 192GB of RAM (or in my case an M5 Max MBP with 128GB of RAM). I don't know what argument you're trying to make here? You are saying this product is pointless, the point of this product is clearly stated and obvious, and now you're acting like its not relevant.

If you don't want to engage in a reasonable discussion, you can get bent.