|
|
|
|
|
by keiferski
8 days ago
|
|
Is a creative human then just not splicing and recombining their experiences into their creative output? No, they aren't. I'm not sure why it's such a popular narrative that all art is just some kind of recombination of existing things; it's not. Actual lived experiences are unique and impact what is created. Novels written by people in post-Revolutionary France are not the same as novels written by post-WW1 France. Events in history shape culture and introduce new ideas and experiences that weren't there before. The gap is that the data humans have access to is much more analogue, emotional, and grounded in the real world compared to the data that AI is currently trained on. That's the problem with your argument, right here. Emotions are not merely portable "data," and framing this way is a problem from the start. I don't think you get human experiences without actually being human. The most perfect LLM copy of a mind is just the copy of externalized output. |
|