[ethbr1]

To expand, positional definition of adjectives tends to be a bad marketing scheme.

Nobody knows that pro and max mean specific things.

If AMD needs to create a full cross-product of their hardware feature set, because they intend to have a SKU for every possible combination, they probably need a better scheme.

Say what you want about Celeron/Pentium/i3/i5/i7, but it mostly got the idea across (except on the occasions Intel hijacked it to upbrand SKUs).

[izacus]

So why do so many of major successful product corporations use this kind of naming scheme?

[lebca]

It is possible to be successful in spite of one’s decisions

[ethbr1]

What other popular products use five separate identifiers in mass market products?

(Ryzen) (AI) (Max+) (Pro) (495)