|
|
|
|
|
by asdfsa32
6 days ago
|
|
In the world of AI hype, everything is to be learned again and we are going to see many many breakthroughs like this. You can see this shift already in the tone of conversation in HN for example. The basics of computer engineering is now novel approaches. We are discovering why programming languages exist, starting with a worst version of Cobal running on a very expensive and probabilistic VM. We will shoehorn every square, rectangular, and all forms of peg through the AI hole. |
|
Drew McDermott, 1976, "Artificial Intelligence Meets Natural Stupidity": https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1045339.1045340
Note that 1976 had some cool AI, including theorem-provers and story-tellers (Knuth wrote a story-telling program, I think it's an exercise in TAoCP). Yet the underlying theory of intelligence was "intelligence is logical processing of symbolic information"; this is obviously inadequate, but the ideology of analytic philosophy is a helluva drug for a scientist. Likewise with the 21st century "intelligence is about correctly predicting things based on past information,"; this is obviously inadequate, but the ideology of big data technocracy is a helluva drug for a scientist.