[shakna]

The catch-all is a problem. We've been studying fallacies in arguments since before the time of Plato, and do not have a complete answer that always works, to prevent the logical failure.

Complex assertions and compounding arguments, can still result in circular reasoning - the petitio principii, or worse.

Most LLMs are guided by strong statements like it must do this or that. Which assumes that it won't apply the fallacy of accident, even though people regularly do. (Don't agree? Argue a definition with a BA for a day and come back to me.)