|
|
|
|
|
by spwa4
6 days ago
|
|
> ... but if you don't think an ethics-bot will ever be a thing, you're not seeing the current state of things. You mean the people who are supposed to judge ethics are lazy like everyone else and also farm out their judgement to AI like everyone else. This is like reading EU commission press releases about regulating AI and realizing there's "AI-isms" in the press releases. They're too short, and they were sloppy before AI could be involved, so I mostly suspect this, but ... who is writing AI regulations? ChatGPT is writing those. Let's hope OpenAI/Anthropic doesn't realize too quickly that writing their political positions into the system prompt just like they're writing their legal positions into the system prompt. The famous example being that, no, Anthropic/OpenAI did nothing wrong illegally downloading and using millions of books. |
|