Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by matheusmoreira 6 days ago
> No project is entitled to host their project there

So tiresome. This is going to lead to an even more fragmented free and open source ecosystem. GitHub is the default choice because it has huge network effects. Codeberg just opted out of those.
3 comments
kurante 6 days ago
Did they, though? Do we have numbers on how many cryptocurrency projects were removed from Codeberg because of this, since GitHub is the default choice? Or are you suggesting that there is going to be a significant split because of this?

I agree that this is probably going to cause some fragmentation, but I'm not convinced that it will do so in a meaningful matter or at the scale at which it is problematic to the free and open source ecosystem.

For what it's worth, Forgejo is working on federation[1], which might address your networking effect concerns?

[1]: https://forgejo.org/2026-05-monthly-report/#federation

link
matheusmoreira 6 days ago
> Or are you suggesting that there is going to be a significant split because of this?

There are going to be many splits. Cryptocurrencies. Vibecoding. Whatever else offends them.

Whether it will be "significant" or not, remains to be seen. I won't be sticking around to witness it.

link
krapp 6 days ago
Good. That's how FOSS is supposed to work.

Codeberg isn't competing against Github for market share, it serves a specific demographic with a specific ideology. Anyone is welcome to use any other host they want for their crypto and AI projects, with whatever policies align with their preferences. Or make your own with blackjack and hookers.

There shouldn't even be "default choices" or "huge network effects" in FOSS anyway. That's just another form of centralization.

link
inigyou 6 days ago
You know every project or collective used to have their own website and that was fine, right?
link