[dbbk]

What did they nerf

[bearjaws]

Apple: adblocking, PWA being put in a odd spot, surely to be followed by a post "nobody was using it" before being removed, if they mention it at all.

Google: ad blocking

[dbbk]

Ad blocking isn't nerfed

[arijun]

It is when compared to Firefox. Safari and now Google claim that it's for security, as the newer interfaces expose way less attack surface for malicious add-ons. I think that it's true that it does improve security, although I'm not sure that I believe Google when they say they're not doing it to stop people from blocking their main revenue source.

[whstl]

At least the blocker I use, uBlock Lite, isn't nerfed. It doesn't have Manifest v3-ish limitations, and can do dynamic blocking, injection, etc.

[arijun]

It cannot do dynamic filtering [1]. Another big one I forgot about is no CNAME uncloaking. Don't get me wrong, uBOL is still a great add on, it's just not possible to do everything you could with the manifest v2 version.

[1] https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-as...

[eipi10_hn]

uBO Lite is exactly MV3, it has most of MV3 limitations plus its own limitations comparing to Chromium. Safari just auto converts MV3 codes to Safari's own blocking engines.

[unsungNovelty]

PWA for starters? They are not interested in Indie devs anyways. Might as well let us use PWA no?

[nozzlegear]

PWAs enjoy excellent support in Safari:

https://pwascore.com

[phoghed]

Safari arguably has better PWA support than Firefox last time I checked.

[dbbk]

How

[EPWN3D]

Nothing. This is just FUD.