|
|
|
|
|
by keeda
6 days ago
|
|
A relevant article I found from an industry insider (which could indicate bias but also relevance): https://www.whitefiber.com/blog/understanding-gpu-lifecycle Which has this anecdotal data point: >... when I left Paperspace in mid-2024, our M4000 GPUs, nine-year-old GPUs, were still consistently utilized at near-total capacity. That’s not a typo. Nine. Years. Old. Still booked, still working, still generating revenue. Also, I won't claim to understand accounting, but in general it seems it is advantageous to accelerate depreciation schedules for high CapEx industries because they lower taxes: https://leyton.com/us/insights/articles/what-is-accelerated-... As such you'd assume these cloud providers to want faster depreciation of their GPU assets rather than slower? I suppose in this case they do have an incentive to show bigger revenue numbers, but there seems to be a trade-off here that is not being discussed? |
|