|
|
|
|
|
|
by wrl
10 days ago
|
|
|
i don't disagree – i have my own internal vector lib of approximations and whatnot for various tradeoffs of precision and speed, so i just use those. it's just that zig has a pretty strong stance of "no unexpected/obscured code execution" so it was surprising to see a vector-capable function that was just a bunch of scalar functions in a trench coat. maybe functions that don't actually support actual vector execution just shouldn't work on vector arguments. i also wouldn't expect `@sin()` to expand in-place out to a full cephes-like sin implementation. maybe a function call. |
|
|
i think that's reasonable.