[gchamonlive]

Looks a lot alike Web UIs SOTA models produce, and you know what I'm really glad.

No more people doing crazy stuff with UX just because.

No more frontend dark magic only the most dedicated zealots can make sense of.

Democratised UI for all. And this might not even have had an AI assisted development, I'm just abusing this comment and going slightly off topic to say I'm happy for this tech, as someone that only dealt with backend and DevOps/SRE to be able to confidently create useful graphical applications for regular users and learning a ton about frontend architecture in the meantime.

Btw, a hall of fame for comments would also be interesting!

[oyster143]

This was 95% made with gpt 5.6 sol high

I actually did the comments internally and will probably post later in the week.

[gchamonlive]

Great work! I'm doing something similar, but using upvoted submissions I did so I can rank posts better, filter out posts about AI but most importantly flag potentially interesting submissions in New that couldn't have made frontpage.

[georgemcbay]

You might have forgot to tell it 'no mistakes' in the prompt?

The 4 boxes at the top are somehow double loading items on refresh (didn't look at the code, just the output) and generating an awful flicker.

[basilikum]

I find you're perspective quite baffling. It is interesting in that you like the standardization and lack of certain web design crimes and I should not be overly negative to the OP showing their work^1. But man, I truly cannot understand how anyone can see that slop design and feel anything positive. It makes me want to instinctively close the tab immediately as soon as I see it.

[1] It's mostly not their work and just generated though that's not as relevant. But still I think we should be polite when someone shows something that has the chance of having some significant amount of human effort in it.

[gchamonlive]

Separating emotion from logic without one dominating the other is a skill. That's Simone Weil's attention. You need to look at the world with curiosity and openness in order to filter out and assimilate only what you wish. See past what is for what in can be. I'm not saying the project is good or if it's aesthetic, but the functionality works and without LLMs this would never have seen the light of day. All these problems you say are easily solvable with something like Stitch, Impeccable and a tad of good taste from the part of the author. But for a MVP or a PoC? That's really more than enough.

[thi2]

And yet the search on mobile opens half cut, the dark mode icon isn't centered like the search icon and in the resurfaced section are overlapping texts. And thats just from glancing through the page on my phone.

Maybe I'm too picky but it gives a sloppy, unpersonal feeling.

[gchamonlive]

I could take your comment and use it as a prompt and depending on the model quality it will have been an ex-bug

[codingdave]

The fact that things like that get into a production app at all is the bigger point. AI slop doesn't even hit a base level of "it works on my machine". When some piece of an app just doesn't work, regardless of whether it was LLM-generated or not, it means there was no QA done on the app. Or at least, not enough.

That is why the term "AI slop" exists. Not because AI cannot produce working code - we all know it can - but because it breeds a low-effort process where people just slap code into production with no regard to quality.