Why do some people get very defensive when you suggest AI isn’t comparable to humans?
Like, where is it coming from?
Why do people seem to want to ascribe human traits on the tech? It’s just technology. Why do we need to draw parallels to biology? Is it actually helpful? My position is “no” because the parallels only seem similar, but fundamentally aren’t.
Why do some people get very defensive when you suggest AI isn’t comparable to humans?
But you didn't do that, did you? You rattled off a goofy cliché about parrots that we've all heard a hundred times before. If that's all you have to contribute to the conversation, go contribute it somewhere else.
Edit: And not a great example to use to prove human-ness considering humans didn't disprove the conjecture?