Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by WillAdams 6 days ago
A good example of the problem with this settlement:

>It appears that LLMs have already incorporated APOSD EDIT: The text of the book _A Philosophy of Software Design_ ENDEDIT (which would seem to be illegal, since it is copyrighted). For example, I have asked ChatGPT questions about APOSD and it seems to be able to answer.

https://groups.google.com/g/software-design-book/c/_wl1DciZZ...
1 comments
raverbashing 6 days ago
I don't see:

- what's APOSD

- "it's illegal since it's copyrighted" makes no sense to me

- The settlement should be exactly to cover their licenses for training

link
WillAdams 6 days ago
Edited to clarify APOSD == the book _A Philosophy of Software Design_

Please ask John Ousterhout what his cut of this settlement will be, and whether or no he agreed to it and finds it acceptable.

link
raverbashing 6 days ago
Yeah ask him how much he gets paid for one copy of the book, I assure you it's not much

If he's not getting a cut of this settlement then that's between him and his publisher.

link
WillAdams 6 days ago
Yes, but what is the calculus of 1 copy of book divided amongst number of copies/usages of LLM which reference said material?

That's the innate disparity and unfairness here --- time was when one made a design which was physically instantiated and replicated, the copies would wear out and one would then earn money again on replacement copies --- this is just another example of the commons and other resources being grabbed by profiteers who use them to make money as opposed for public benefit.

link