|
|
|
|
|
by yorwba
6 days ago
|
|
The participants of the Geneva Conventions were well aware that in war, harming innocent civilians and their property is often hard to avoid. So when they delineated what should henceforth count as a war crime, they were careful to weigh collateral damage against the expected military benefit of an attack. So killing civilians isn't automatically a war crime, but pointlessly killing civilians is. Saying Russia is "deliberately targeting the civilian population" is implicitly a war crime accusation, but it could very well be that the Russian officer who made the targeting decision was actually trying to hit a ball-bearing factory and accuracy just wasn't good enough. Though for FPV drones that can be retargeted in real time, such an argument is harder to make. In any case, whether or not something is a war crime depends on the state of mind of the decision makers, not just the outcome. |
|
The state of mind of Ukrainian decision-makers is there: "a psychological effect on Russian society and, likely, on continued support for the war". It somewhat puzzles me why they want to create widespread public support in Russia for escalation.