[aqme28]

I feel like you're suffering from some sort of confirmation bias.

I've worked under a top talent CEO, and the company collapsed. He made some gambles and they just didn't work out. I am not convinced that a third-rate version of him would have done significantly worse.

[fragmede]

Is it just that the company collapsed? The third-rate version of him probably would have ended up in jail a-la SBF or Ms Holmes, with hopefully no one getting killed or maimed, or chemicals in a factory causing cancer across neighborhoods or poisoning wells or something.

There are things worse than losing your job.

[yifanl]

Only truly exceptional executives can be SBF or Elizabeth Holmes.

[fragmede]

There's also Madoff.

[aqme28]

Or maybe the third rate version would have made different choices, and those may have due to pure chance worked out well for us.