[nonadhocproblem]

> uses a specific, objectively nonsensical critique of LLMs (the idea that an algorithm using matrix operations as a primitive cannot emulate "true" intelligence)

> receives pushback on the specific, objectively nonsensical critique

> "oh so you're saying that LLM computation and human cognition are equivalent? they're glorified calculators that disprove the Jacobian conjecture!!!"

[throwaway277432]

>the idea that an algorithm using matrix operations as a primitive cannot emulate "true" intelligence

I did not say that. Not even close.

In the words of Claude: I’ll end the conversation here. <end_conversation>