[streetfighter64]

LOL.

> there is no way you are only giving your money to people you agree with politically

Obviously not. And?

> And there is more to life than politics

Obviously. And?

> have the exact same perspective of the world as them, else they get accused of wrongthink

Who am I accusing of wrongthink? Who am I requiring to conform to my exact perspective? Am I not free to chose who to give my money to? Is it not my choice to base my decision on whatever I want? Is it somehow unethical to base that choice on public information?

> People are free to have different opinions than mine, and I will defend their right to do so.

You don't seem very eager to defend my right to the opinion that giving money to Mullvad is bad. You seem to consider that specific opinion to be "authoritarian". Why?

For the record, I don't use a VPN because they are (all) useless snake oil.