[applfanboysbgon]

AGENTS.MD and CLAUDE.MD also provide easy detection avenues. Trivial measures will probably catch 70-80% or more. You don't need a 100% enforcement rate for a rule to exist, indeed there are basically no rules anywhere in the world that achieve that.

[Mashimo]

But that just means they probably used AI to help code, not that it is vibe coded, no?

[graemep]

It does not prove anything. Some could not commit those files to avoid detection, and those files exist in projects in which only some code is AI generated. I have them in projects where, for example, LLMs were used to generate tests and for a few fixes/additions in the rest of the code.

[mattashii]

Whilst they may provide a strong signal, I wouldn't call it a guarantee. If I wanted to avoid vibe-coded contributions I might add such files, but with instructions for the agents that they're not allowed to read or touch any of the files in the repository.

[Trung0246]

At that point just use whitelist-based approach. I already used gitignore like that. It also easier to avoid committing temp file and secret through whitelist because those file are never in gitignore in the first place.

[ramon156]

Then the linux repo is also banned. I don't think that's a good way to detect "vibe coding"

[FabCH]

The Linux repo clearly would be considered vibe-coded by Codeberg policy and it being banned is the policy working as intended.

It is probably a good example of why do many people think that the policy is ultimately counter productive even to Codeberg itself.