Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by awesan 10 days ago
It's not strange to ban chess computers at a chess tournament, and it's equally not strange to ban AI code on a code hosting platform.

The costs involved with hosting a bunch of vibe coded stuff that no one is really invested in or cares about would undermine the mission of Codeberg, so it makes sense for them. Other code hosting platforms can go a different route.
1 comments
skeledrew 10 days ago
> The costs involved

How much does it cost to host a few text files in the same way a bunch of other text files are already being hosted? Particularly if there's no investment - ie no significant traffic - in accessing said text files?

link
AloysB 10 days ago
> How much does it cost to host a few text files

At large scale, it probably adds up. Remember that they also need to ensure backup, etc. Whether or not your code is being "used" or not, it has a cost.

Even GitHub has been struggling last year with the ramping amount of LLM produced code. I can imagine that it is a real issue.

They already encourage users to use 'agit' instead of doing 'physical' forks.

I imagine that the costs are sufficient enough to motivate them to follow through on this; on top of the ethical and legal concerns.

---

Why don't you host your own git for those dormant projects? It's really easy, you don't even need a forge. Just a bare git repo on server via ssh and you off to the races.

I think their stance is fine; there are other providers if you don't agree with this.

link
skeledrew 10 days ago
They aren't doing anything "at large scale" that would matter as such. It's not like they're working with MBs of storage, and even then a single 1.44MB diskette can still store a heck of a lot of text (yes, I used to use those).
link