[g-b-r]

Aren't rationalists supposed to be objective and motivate their claims, rather than belittling any critic with unsubstantiated statements?

> This is a textbook study of motivated reasoning

What would be his motive, why would he have preconceptions about you?

Could it be that it's your messages here that are motivated, and with scarce reasoning?

[vovavili]

>What would be his motive

A libertarian socialist podcaster tries to discuss an online culture that is adjacent to Silicon Valley tech scene. He then proceeds to take movement’s worst manifestations as its essence. One would have to be naive to miss the source of his bias.

[g-b-r]

My feeling is that he understands your "online culture" much better than you, is very balanced and careful in the video, and you're probably a lot younger, inexperienced with internet groups and impressionable than him.

Take his advice to talk with (and listen to!) people outside your cadre, and to consider the possibility that you're entirely in the wrong. And maybe to touch grass.

Cheers

[vovavili]

>is very balanced and careful in the video

A part of me somewhat wishes I was this easily swayed by YouTube smooth talkers.