|
|
|
|
|
|
by reinitctxoffset
8 days ago
|
|
|
Seems like a breakdown on the incentives / imperatives in the field? I hope that's not an over bold guess from a non-mathematician. Couldn't people in principle continue to study a problem that's only been shown to break at one point? Prove something adjacent, or slightly weaker, or elaborate the counter example into a powerful explanatory framework? |
|
|