[jval]

I think this article is trying to get at a supposed culture of failure worship that exists in the Valley but I don't think that the point is clearly made that anyone is that obsessed with failure. Everyone wants to be successful and nobody regards a 3x failed entrepreneur as being as reputable as a 3x successful entrepreneur. People don't make a point of reading into the details behind success and failure.

I think it is more accurate to say that Silicon Valley has a culture of failure tolerance that is far above the ordinary level of failure tolerance one would expect in other societies. And that is a good thing. In fact, it is probably not high enough, which encourages entrepreneurs to chase quick flips so they can write "(2x exit)" next to their name rather than give a huge, risky idea a chance.

That said, I see the point that failure doesn't feel great. If the author is really trying to say "don't chase failure" then I wholeheartedly agree. Failing sucks and it feels awful, but I think anyone who has been through a failure knows that there is no way you can put a gloss on it. After the first failure you don't need someone to tell you how bad it is, you need someone to encourage you to try again.

[adii]

I am saying "don't chase failure". I'm also saying that learning from success is just as important as learning from our mistakes.

Similarly, I'm not convinced that the startup community isn't valuing failure. If I look around at how we celebrate startups raising money (sometimes by entrepreneurs' whose only claim to fame is having done that before), I think we've got our wires re: failure crossed.