|
|
|
|
|
by socialcommenter
8 days ago
|
|
I disagree on so many levels that it would be impossible to have a reasonable debate. To give only my most charitable counterpoint: (If, big if*) successful AGI will be such an accelerant to human thought, it should be able to reproduce every human work, every scientific theory, etc. without any training data, in a decade. All we have ever done as humans is look at the world and ourselves, and then create new data out of what we've seen[0]. Now imagine how much parallel compute we could throw at doing the same thing. [0] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=f-XyJ3GlrWw * Big, enormous, trillion dollar if. |
|