Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by creshal 12 days ago
The primary advantage of dedicated hardware accelerators for the past ~15 years been power efficiency, rather than performance. Not much of a problem on a desktop, but very noticeable on mobile devices.
2 comments

8K decoding needs HW acceleration, unless having 8-16 cores with AVX-512.
Yes, but that's way out of budget for most consumers.
Actually not really, Lunar Lake chips with Xe2 graphics have VVC decoding in hardware which can do 8K.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versatile_Video_Coding

They were likely saying that 8K displays are way out of budget for most consumers.
Where I live, we have 50 inch 8k TVs for 180 USD.
Do many people use Firefox on 50" 8K TVs as opposed to regular monitors? I wouldn't want such a large display on a computer unless the computer is being used as media server. And my experience when I got new monitors for work about 18 months ago, was that decent ones at higher than 1440p were more expensive than I felt was worth it.

Also, I expect one or more of the following from a 50" 8K TV at that price:

- Bundled with ad/spyware.

- Poor image and/or sound quality.

- Doesn’t last long, or image quality very noticeably degrades after a relatively short amount of use.

I also wonder if perhaps it’s still like back when HD was still new, where TVs would advertise “Full HD”, but were actually only referring to being able to accept a 1080p input signal which they would then downscale to their <720p LCD panels.

I could also imagine the decoded output being pluggable into Vulkan-based filters (mpv uses https://code.videolan.org/videolan/libplacebo) without slow device->host copying.