[Hilliard_Ohiooo]

To answer for OP:

We are now calling text and image generators "intelligent" in the same way a spell checker is intelligent.

Whatever it's become, "AI" research started as a way to study digital neurology, or how to digitize a mind, not just how to generate data.

The Turing Test should have had a caveat, it needs to fool a, "non-stupid" person, and we still have not gotten even close to passing that version.

[radial_symmetry]

What exactly would a 'non-stupid' person do to catch the latest models on a Turing Test? Aside from being aware of AI 'tells' like em-dashes.

[dominotw]

If this was true. I would repalce myself with ai that pretends to be me on slack.

my coworkers would know almost immediately if i did that.

[HeatrayEnjoyer]

> my coworkers would know almost immediately if i did that.

The same would happen if you were replaced by any random human.

[daveguy]

But immitating others is about the only thing genAI does. Sometimes "others" is a 'programmer', sometimes "others" is an 'artist', but regardless, it still does it poorly.

[dominotw]

that would be a silly test then

[pixl97]

It sounds kind of like you made up a silly test then.

[dominotw]

what test?